Don’t tell Nigel Farage but the
EU might be about to do a good thing. They do that sometimes, just to lull us
all into a false sense of security. In this instance, they are about to pass
some new data marketing laws...possibly as soon as January but certainly within
the next decade. You know how Brussels works right?
Data can be a bit dull to the
uninitiated, until you stop and think about it. And changing marketing
database’s from opt out to opt in is hardly Game of Thrones stuff, is it? Well,
let me try to shine some light on the issue for you.
We get ‘junk’ mail, either
through the good old post-box or via email, because we managed to let our name
and address get on a list somewhere. You can do that in a bazillion ways...buy
something and fail to tick the right box, take part in a survey, have a baby.
Yes, that’s right, have a baby. Every
new mother gets a visit from the Bounty rep after giving birth, in the hospital
(or at least they used to, I have not been involved in baby production for
fifteen years so I am taking the allegedly option here, the data collection
process may have changed). The nice Bounty lady delivers a load of free stuff,
and takes your name and address...and the direct marketing assault can begin.
Clever, aren’t they? Most people
will never have realised that Bounty made a lot of money from their list sales,
but to any company selling products needed by new parents or new born babies
they are quite literally a goldmine. And unless you specifically opt out, you
get the marketing assault.
But what if you had to
specifically opt in?
At the moment, by the time you
are a proper grown up, in your thirties say, you will appear on literally
hundreds of direct marketing lists. Some are well run, properly sold and you
can get off them if you try hard, and if you sign up for telephone preference
services or mail preference services, you should not be contacted by anyone
following the laws. And some aren’t.
The Information Commissioner,
Chris Graham, and his Info Hordes (I like to think of him rather like Genghis
Khan) fine people who ignore this sort of stuff, but he doesn’t catch everyone
by any means. I am on the aforementioned preference services and I still get
the chance to buy Viagra most days of the week (although we all get much less
junk email now because ISP’s are getting better at preventing the real dross).
Opt In will decimate every decent
list, because despite popular rumour, turkeys don’t vote for Christmas. Given
the option whether to receive marketing messages or not, most of us will choose
not. Not that there are many decent lists to be honest, but that is a whole
different subject.
And what will that leave us with?
Well, at the top end, and this is
a fair bit of volume driven by Charities, banks, insurance companies and the
like, direct marketing will reduce. There will simply be less data available.
And at the bottom end, where scant regard for the rules is paid, not much will
change at all. The regulators will hurt the good guys and the bad guys will
carry on regardless.
Which is the trouble with all
regulations, says he, trying to get back on topic. Genghis Graham brings his
mighty scimitar down on the guilty...and rightly so...but those who fall foul
of the regulations and get caught are almost always the big boys. In data
breach terms that means the major businesses who own up, because most of the
people who get fined for losing data have followed the rules and ‘fessed’ up to
their own disaster.
Smaller, less high profile businesses
who screw up keep quiet and hope for the best. Or they break the rules
deliberately to save money and they take the chance. Regulations won’t stop
that sort of behaviour.
Deterrents reduce ‘crime’ they do not eradicate it.
My own personal passion regarding
data is more about education. We should all understand what our personal
information means to us, and that it has value. Right from the time when a kid
gets their first mobile phone or laptop they need to be taught what is going to
happen when they sign up for anything, buy anything or do anything. In
business, we need to understand best practise and be helped to do the right
thing (and understand what the right thing is and why it is right) rather than
threatened with a fate worse than death if we screw up.
In data marketing terms, there
will always be marketing lists, so there should be a legitimate way to build
them, but the regulators must also find a way to go after the cowboys in the
black hats, not the ones in grey and white. In date security terms, we have to
make it easier for people to do the right things, both in terms of cost and in
terms of access to a reputable service.
Either that or we keep on fining
big businesses who make mistakes and let all the real chancers carry on getting
away with it.
No comments:
Post a Comment